This post is part of the Great Villain Blogathon 2017 hosted by Ruth of Silver Screenings, Karen of Shadows & Satin, and Kristina of Speakeasy. See the list of participants for this event HERE!
On my first viewing, Whit Stillman’s adaptation of Jane Austen’s posthumously published novella Lady Susan immediately shot up to the top of my list of favorite Austen film adaptations (though I still put Ang Lee and Emma Thompson’s version of Sense and Sensibility in the number one spot). I have to admit I was never a big fan of Stillman’s previous films (Metropolitan, The Last Days of Disco, Barcelona). His entitled, upper-class modern American characters grated on me. But it turns out it’s that very thing that makes him a perfect match for Austen’s work.
As with all of Austen’s novels, the major theme is how marriage is the only respectable option for the women of her society. Only in this one, she makes a character who would have normally been the antagonist the protagonist.
Lady Susan Vernon (Kate Beckinsale) is recently widowed and quite poor. She is so bad off she’s forced to basically crash in other people’s homes. She has a sweet teenaged daughter, Frederica (Morfydd Clark) she keeps in a boarding school she can’t afford.
As the story opens, she has been ejected by her latest hostess because she is suspected of having an affair with her husband, Lord Manwaring. Lady Susan then imposes on her brother in law and his wife, Charles and Catherine Vernon (Justin Edwards and Emma Greenwell). They adore their niece Frederica, but can’t stand Lady Susan, and fear her reputation will harm them in some way.
To their horror, Catherine Vernon’s brother Reginald DeCourcey (Xavier Samuel), who they were hoping to match with Frederica, becomes instead enchanted by Lady Susan. Frederica runs away from her boarding school because she is being relentlessly pursued by the wealthy but epically dimwitted Sir James Martin (Tom Bennett).
The unconcerned Lady Susan refuses to rescue her daughter from the unwanted attentions of Sir James, seeing the match as most appropriate. (Did I mention he’s enormously wealthy?) The only person she truly confides in is her friend Alicia Johnson (Chloe Sevigny) an American married to an older man who prefers living in England.
Since this is one of Jane Austen’s lesser-known works, it would be a shame to spoil the plot turns, especially Lady Susan’s many superb manipulations in her pursuit of a wealthy husband and personal happiness.
I was very determined to pick a female villain for the blogathon this year, but found that too many fit into the “psycho obsessed with a man” category. I wanted something far less stereotypical, and remembered how much I adored this movie and its protagonist.
Normally, I would perhaps make the argument that Lady Susan isn’t REALLY a villain, only a woman forced into bad deeds by the limited role her society has given her. This is true, but she is so audacious, so unconcerned by how she hurts other people, including her own daughter, I think she absolutely qualifies as a full-blown villainous character.
Beckinsale (easily the performance of her career—I still can’t believe she didn’t earn an Oscar nomination) and Stillman make Lady Susan so clever, so funny, so dead-on in her observations of other people that it’s kind of hard not to like her at least a little. She has elements of Austen’s other ruthless, marriage minded ladies who make the lives of her heroines, if not miserable, at least difficult: Lucy Steel of Sense & Sensibility, Mary Crawford of Mansfield Park, Caroline Bingley of Pride & Prejudice. Unlike these other ladies, she’s already been married, a mother, and her age is not in her favor. Yet she refuses to let these disadvantages stop her from securing a new and very rich husband.
In an era when everyone is terrified of what would happen if they don’t follow the rules, Lady Susan is a woman who doesn’t care about them at all. Even though her behavior is fairly well-known, everyone has a stake in not exposing her entirely and exiling her from society. She takes full advantage of their conundrum.
What’s most interesting about the movie’s source material is Austen wrote it when she was quite young, when one would more likely imagine this cynical, scheming character coming out of the pen of an older and worldly woman. It pretty much shatters the notion of Austen as a retiring recluse for most of her life.
Austen’s stories are populated with perfect foils for her main characters. This is no exception. Her friend Mrs. Johnson is in a situation Lady Susan would never find herself in, completely under the control of her husband’s whims. Her daughter is a properly bred young woman who is more of a hindrance to her than an asset because she refuses to settle for any handy rich husband. Reginald DeCourcey is another type of character who appears often in her novels: a worthy young man briefly dazzled by an unworthy woman.
Then there is James Martin. If there was a Dunderheaded Characters in Movies Blogathon, I would pick him as a topic. He makes Mr. Collins from Pride & Prejudice seem like a rocket scientist in comparison. I have to take the focus off Lady Susan for a moment and applaud Stillman for how he introduces the character to the audience. His first full scene is a perfect portrait of the foolishness people are forced to put up with because an accident of birth gave someone wealth and rank.
The clever, the principled, the naïve, the stupid—none of them have a chance against Lady Susan Vernon. Stillman reminds us that in addition to great love stories, Austen could also create dark comedy built around a shrewd villain.
18 thoughts on “The Great Villain Blogathon: Lady Susan Vernon in Love & Friendship (2016)”
Excellent post and excellent film.
Thank you. So happy to see so much love for this film!
Wonderful post! I thoroughly enjoyed Kate Beckinsale in this role.
She is magnificent in the role. I wonder if the fact that it was an Amazon-made film that kept her and others involved in the film from receiving nominations. A real shame! She should have been showered with many awards!
I always enjoy watching her. She’s one of my favourite actresses.
I loved, LOVED Kate Beckinsale here. Like you said, she doesn’t at all care about society’s rules. She’s also the smartest person in the room. (I laughed out loud at your thoughts on James Martin. His first scene is utterly fabulous.)
You raised a good point about many female villains being obsessed with a male character, and Lady Susan definitely is not. You also talked about her indifference to her daughter and her friends (except for Alicia Johnson). It’s a sign of a superb performance when an actor can be rather callous yet still retain your sympathy. Why DIDN’T Kate B. get an Oscar nod?
Thanks so much for joining the blogathon, and for bringing the remarkable Lady Susan with you. 🙂
Thank you! So happy to see such a positive response to my choice. I was worried I was going to get “…but she’s really NOT a villain, is she?” comments. Apparently, many besides me see the villainy in her heart. 🙂
I must not have been paying attention last year because this film escaped my notice entirely. I was fascinated by your well-written article and the character of Lady Susan. I have some catching up to do.
It was easy to miss. It originally debuted on Amazon, then was briefly in theaters (I guess they were hoping to qualify it for awards season).
Definitely check it out, I’m sure you will enjoy it!
Not familiar with this very recent film–funny how the media only seems to promote big blockbuster comic book movies these days.
Have never been a big Beckinsale fan (she is pretty though!), but it looks like she got a great role to sink her teeth into. Look forward to watching this one–thanks to your wonderful post!
It’s a shame it didn’t get an strong Oscar campaign, possibly because Amazon had not done one before. Hope you enjoy it!
The words “Jane Austen” are enough to make me wary of a movie. I associate Austen with love and romance, of which I am not a fan. Still, it sounds like it might be worth trying. Good review.
Ha-ha, that’s EXACTLY the problem with the latest Austen revival, in my opinion–they treat her books like mushy love stories. There was a time when they were considered suitable only for men because they were too cynical to be romantic. Charlotte Bronte, who wrote Jane Eyre, loathed her books because she felt they were so cynical about love.
That’s why I like this adaptation so much–it “gets” Austen in a way many adaptations of the last two decades don’t.
Love Kate Beckinsale and am very eager to see this after hearing all the raves and now reading your great post. Thanks as always for joining us for this blogathon!
Great! Hope you enjoy it. Thanks for co-hosting!
Oh, wow! I think yours is my favourite entry to this blogathon. So original for you to pick Lady Susan. I did a review of the film back in August, and I too cannot quite believe how the Academy could have ignored that gem of a film.